A legal site that ranks on practice-area search and respects ethics rules
Authority-forward legaltech or law firm site with practice-area SEO, qualified intake, and jurisdiction-aware copy. Launched in three to four weeks from $2,000.
Who this is for
Legaltech founder or marketing partner at a mid-sized firm whose current site reads like a 1990s directory and does not rank for practice-area searches.
The pain today
- Site reads like a directory, not a modern authoritative practice
- No practice-area SEO — losing local rankings to larger firms
- Intake form asks for privileged information without safeguards
- Attorney bios are thin, no publications or speaking engagements
- Reviews and testimonials violate bar rules or lack proper disclosure
The outcome you get
- Legaltech or law firm site from $2,000 in three to four weeks
- Practice-area pages structured to rank on local and topical queries
- Intake form aligned with bar ethics rules for your jurisdiction
- Attorney bios that position real expertise
- Accessibility baseline and jurisdiction-specific disclosures
Why legal sites underperform in local search
Law firm SEO is about local and practice-area authority. Firms that do not rank usually fail on three axes. One: practice-area pages are one-paragraph stubs instead of real content. Two: location pages list office addresses without actual local content. Three: Google Business Profile is not connected to the site or is missing attorney schema. Fix all three and rankings climb. Firms at every size can outrank larger competitors on specific terms — 'employment lawyer Philadelphia,' 'wrongful termination attorney Denver' — if the pages actually match search intent.
Practice-area page structure that ranks
Five blocks per practice-area page. Clear outcome statement — what a client gets from this practice. When clients need this help — signs and situations in plain language. Process — how the firm handles cases in this area. Representative matters or case results (with anonymisation if required by your state bar). Attorney profiles tied to this practice. Plus an intake CTA. Pages built this way rank well and pre-qualify leads. Thin pages do neither. For legaltechs selling to law firms, the equivalent is product-detail pages that match how legal ops buyers search.
Lead intake without violating ethics rules
State bar rules vary on what a law firm site can do with intake. Three safe defaults. One: intake form collects name, jurisdiction, practice area, and high-level issue — not detailed privileged facts. Two: the form clearly states that submission does not create an attorney-client relationship. Three: review happens under conflict-check procedures before a detailed response. I build the form and the boilerplate language; your state bar compliance counsel reviews and customises the exact wording. For legaltechs selling to firms, the intake form is less sensitive but still needs clear terms and privacy posture.
Pricing and timeline
Starter $2,000 — up to ten pages, three practice areas, attorney bios, basic intake form. Business $5,000 — full practice-area catalog, location pages, blog, ethics-aware intake. Corporate $10,000+ — multi-office, multi-language, deep case-management integration gateway, associate portal link. Three to four weeks start to launch. 14-day money-back guarantee. 1-year bug warranty. 100 percent code ownership under Work Made for Hire. US LLC invoicing. Legal and ethics review typically adds a week; budget for that in the project plan.
Case: LAK Embalagens — catalog pattern applied to practice areas
LAK Embalagens is a B2B manufacturer, but the information architecture transfers to a law firm. I built their corporate site with a catalog-first structure — clear categories, fast filtering, deep product pages with detail. Bounce dropped 45 percent, impressions 3x'd, rankings landed top three. A law firm with 8 to 30 practice areas runs the same playbook — practice areas instead of product categories, attorney profiles instead of spec sheets, case results instead of customer testimonials. Clean taxonomy and page depth outranks flashy homepages every time.
When a full case-management integration is needed
A marketing site with intake routing to Clio, MyCase, or PracticePanther is enough for most firms. Deeper integration — client portal, document exchange, billing visibility — is Applications-subscription scope, multi-month work. For legaltechs selling to firms, your product probably is the case management — the marketing site sells it but does not replace it. Most firms should launch a strong marketing site first, capture SEO and intake, then invest in deeper digital tooling once the ROI is clear. Starting with a marketing site avoids over-building before the intake volume justifies it.
Recent proof
A comparable engagement, delivered and documented.
Turned a B2B manufacturer into a digital showroom
Designed and developed a high-performance institutional website to showcase packaging solutions and generate qualified leads.
Frequently asked questions
The questions prospects ask before they book.
- Does the site comply with bar advertising rules?
- I build the structure to support compliance — boilerplate disclosures, versioned copy in the CMS, clear disclaimer placement — but your state bar compliance counsel reviews the actual wording. Bar rules vary significantly by state: some require specific disclaimers on every page, some require labelling testimonials, some prohibit specific claims. The site is built with placeholders that your compliance team fills in. I have worked on legaltech and regulated-industry sites and know where the common traps are.
- Can we integrate with Clio or another case-management tool?
- Yes. Intake form submissions route to Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, or your internal CRM through API or webhook. Basic integration is included in the Business tier — form data lands in the CMT (case-management tool) with practice area, jurisdiction, and contact info mapped. Deeper integration (two-way sync, client portal) is Applications-scope work. For 80 percent of firms, the one-way intake flow covers the need.
- How do we handle online reviews?
- Display reviews through official embeds from Google, Avvo, Martindale, or your primary review platform. Do not copy-paste testimonials into the site — most state bars require disclosure, consent, and sometimes a case-result-specific disclaimer. For sensitive practice areas (personal injury, criminal defence), review practices need extra care. I set up the technical integration; your compliance counsel determines the review strategy and disclosure language.
- Can the site support e-signature for engagement letters?
- Yes. DocuSign, Adobe Sign, HelloSign, and PandaDoc all integrate with a marketing site via deep-link or embedded form. For firms wanting client-specific engagement-letter generation with e-sign, that flow sits in your case-management tool or a dedicated workflow — not the public site. The marketing site initiates the e-sign flow from an intake form or a quote; the full workflow lives in the CMT.
- How do you handle multi-office firms?
- Each office gets a dedicated page with address, hours, attorneys, and local practice areas. Navigation surfaces the closest office based on visitor IP (with a manual override). Each office page is optimised for local SEO — unique content, local schema, Google Business Profile linked. For firms with 5+ offices, the Corporate tier includes a scalable location system where adding a new office is a CMS entry, not a developer task.
Ready to start?
Tell me what you need in 60 seconds. Tailored proposal in your inbox within 6 hours.