HIPAA-aware site with online booking, provider profiles, insurance information, and mobile-first patient flows. Launched in 3-4 weeks from $2,999.
- Design
- Build
- Launch
fixed-price project
Who this is for
You run a clinic, medical practice, or healthcare startup. Your current site loads slowly on phones, has no online booking, and the contact form collects patient details with zero HIPAA posture. Competitors with cleaner sites are taking your search traffic.
The pain today
- WordPress template from 2015 looks dated and fails Core Web Vitals on mobile
- No online booking — phone intake is the only channel, and staff time reflects it
- Contact form collects symptoms and insurance info with no BAA in place
- Provider pages list a name and a headshot, no credentials, no specialties
- Insurance and patient resource pages are missing entirely or buried and stale
The outcome you get
- Modern healthcare site live in 3-4 weeks from $2,999
- HIPAA-aware contact flows — marketing forms stay out of PHI scope, clinical intake routes to a compliant vendor
- Online booking embedded from your scheduling tool with a clean handoff
- Provider bios with photos, credentials, specialties, and direct booking links
- WCAG 2.1 AA baseline, ADA readiness, and an insurance page patients can actually use
Why healthcare websites fail the patient-trust test
Healthcare website design carries a weight that most other industries do not. Patients arrive with anxiety, not curiosity. They are deciding whether to book an appointment with a stranger who will examine them. An outdated site does not just look bad — it signals negligence. If a practice's site loads slowly, lists providers without credentials, or has a contact form with no privacy notice, a patient reads that as 'this practice does not pay attention to details.' That judgment transfers directly to their perception of clinical care.
I build healthcare sites that pass the trust test in the first ten seconds: clear provider credentials, mobile-fast load times, a visible booking path, and insurance information that is findable without a phone call. Everything else on the page is secondary.
Modern healthcare site live in 3-4 weeks from $2,999
What HIPAA actually requires on a marketing website
HIPAA governs PHI — protected health information. A marketing site collecting only a name, email, and a general inquiry ('I'd like to book a consultation') is typically not in scope. The moment a form asks a patient to describe symptoms, upload records, or reference a specific condition, that data becomes PHI and requires a Business Associate Agreement with the form provider, TLS 1.2+ encryption in transit, and AES-256 encryption at rest.
The practical approach: keep marketing forms light and clinical intake separate. I route general inquiries through a standard contact form, then connect clinical intake to a HIPAA-compliant vendor — Jotform Healthcare, Formstack Health, or your EHR's own intake module. I build to that boundary on every healthcare project. No marketing contact form in my builds attempts to do clinical intake work.
One thing worth clarifying: HIPAA compliance is not a website certification. There is no badge or stamp. It is a set of technical and administrative controls applied to the parts of your operation that touch PHI. Your BAA with your form vendor, your hosting provider's security posture, and your staff training all matter as much as the website itself.
2M+: Records processed.
The six pages a medical practice website needs
Six pages carry most of the patient decision-making load. Services: what you treat, written in plain language a non-specialist can scan in 30 seconds. Providers: individual bios with credentials, specialties, languages spoken, and a direct booking link. Each provider bio page is its own local SEO asset. Locations: address, hours, parking, transit, and accessibility notes for each site. Booking: either an embedded widget from your scheduler or a clean, direct call-to-action pointing to it. Insurance: which plans you accept, what the billing process looks like, and who to call with questions. Patient resources: intake forms, pre-visit instructions, and billing FAQs.
Everything else — blog, news, press — is optional and depends entirely on whether your team has bandwidth to maintain it. Sites fail when they try to serve ten audiences and half those pages go stale within six months.
Specialty-specific considerations that generic agencies miss
A dermatology practice and a psychiatry practice need fundamentally different site structures. Dermatology patients expect before-and-after treatment galleries, clear procedure descriptions with recovery timelines, and photo-forward provider pages. Psychiatry patients need privacy-first language, minimal clinical jargon, a clear explanation of what the first session looks like, and HIPAA-compliant messaging options. Mental health practices also need to think carefully about chatbots — a general-purpose AI chatbot handling triage questions on a psychiatry site is a liability, not a convenience.
Pediatric sites need a dual audience: parents making booking decisions and children who will visit the office. Physical therapy sites need a patient education section — exercise libraries, post-procedure instructions — that keeps patients engaged between visits. I ask about specialty workflow early in the discovery call and build the information architecture from there, not from a generic healthcare template.
Real proof: Reevia and 2M+ records synced for a veterinary network
Reevia provides CRM and data integration services to one of Brazil's largest veterinary networks. Their challenge was not dissimilar to what many healthcare practices face: four separate systems, no unified view of patient (or in their case, animal patient) data, and a manual reconciliation process that introduced errors. I built an integration layer that synced 2M+ records from four systems into a single HubSpot source of truth, with under 50 seconds source-to-destination latency, in four weeks.
The direct lesson for healthcare website projects: the technical infrastructure behind a patient-facing site matters as much as the design. Booking widgets that do not sync to your EHR create double-entry work. Forms that live outside your HIPAA boundary create compliance exposure. The site is the front door; the integrations are the plumbing. I build both to work together from day one.
Page speed and Core Web Vitals in a clinical context
More than 70% of healthcare searches happen on mobile. A site that takes four seconds to load on a 4G connection loses the patient before the first page renders — not just to a slower experience, but to a competitor whose site loaded faster. Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, INP) are both a Google ranking signal and a patient experience metric. A slow site in a high-intent search context is a business problem, not just a technical one.
Every healthcare site I build is tested against Lighthouse and WebPageTest on mobile before launch. I use Next.js for static generation of provider and service pages, serve images at correct sizes through next/image, and load third-party booking widgets asynchronously so they do not block the initial paint. The result: fast, accessible, and ranked.
Healthcare website pricing and what each tier covers
Starter at $2,999 covers up to eight pages — services, providers, locations, booking integration, patient resources, and a contact form with the correct HIPAA boundary. Business at $7,999 adds custom provider bio pages with specialty-specific layouts, a full patient resources hub, multilingual support, and compliant form routing. Corporate at $11,999 and above handles multi-location architecture, a scalable provider directory, deep EHR integrations, and insurance acceptance pages at scale.
Timeline: three to four weeks start to launch on every tier. The 14-day money-back guarantee and one-year bug warranty apply across all tiers. Every engagement is Work Made for Hire — once you pay, the code is yours. I am not a clinical writer; you or your marketing lead provides medical copy. I handle layout, structure, technical delivery, and integration.
Recent proof
A comparable engagement, delivered and documented.
Four systems, one source of truth: HubSpot visibility for one of Brazil's largest vet networks
Built a custom integration layer for Reevia that connects four source systems into HubSpot for one of Brazil's largest veterinary companies. Over 2 million records processed with full normalization. Any lead from any system is inside HubSpot in under 50 seconds, standardized and ready to use.
Read the case studyKeep reading
Frequently asked questions
The questions prospects ask before they book.
Only the parts that touch PHI — protected health information — need HIPAA controls. A marketing page collecting name, email, and a general booking inquiry is typically not in scope. The moment a form asks patients to describe symptoms, upload records, or reference a specific condition, that data is PHI and requires a Business Associate Agreement with the form vendor, encrypted transit, and encrypted storage. I keep marketing forms out of scope and route clinical intake to a compliant third party like Jotform Healthcare or your EHR's intake module.
Most scheduling tools — Zocdoc, Jane App, SimplePractice, Athena, NextGen, Epic MyChart — provide either an embeddable booking widget or a direct-link. I wire whichever your practice uses. Two-way EHR sync (real-time availability, patient record write-back) is Applications-subscription scope, not a marketing site project. For the majority of practices, an embedded booking widget or a clean call-to-action handles intake cleanly without deep integration.
Every site I build meets WCAG 2.1 AA baseline: keyboard navigation, screen reader support, color contrast ratios, alt text, and labeled form inputs. The DOJ has established WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the technical standard for Medicare and Medicaid participating organizations. I run automated audits with axe and Lighthouse plus manual screen-reader testing. This eliminates the common technical failures plaintiff attorneys target. Ongoing accessibility depends on your team adding compliant content after launch — I document how in a handoff guide.
Display reviews through official embeds from Google Business Profile, Healthgrades, or a review aggregator. Do not copy-paste individual patient testimonials unless the patient has signed a written release — any review that references a condition, treatment, or outcome can raise HIPAA considerations. I wire the embed integration and flag any disclosure language worth reviewing. If you have no review strategy yet, I recommend starting with Google Business Profile optimization rather than a testimonial block on the homepage.
WordPress can host a marketing site with a HIPAA-aware structure, but most off-the-shelf form plugins (Gravity Forms, Contact Form 7, WPForms) do not offer a Business Associate Agreement, which means any PHI collected through them creates a compliance gap. I build in Next.js and integrate a compliant third-party form vendor for any data that approaches PHI scope. The result is faster, more secure, and easier to audit than a WordPress stack with plugins patched for compliance.
Three to four weeks is standard for Starter and Business tiers. That assumes your content — provider bios, service descriptions, photos — is ready at kickoff or within the first week. If content is delayed, timeline shifts accordingly. I build in sprints with daily async updates, so you see progress each day rather than a big reveal at the end. Corporate tier multi-location projects run six to eight weeks depending on the number of provider pages and EHR integration scope.
The marketing site can explain which providers offer telehealth, describe how a virtual visit works, and link directly to your telehealth platform — Doxy.me, Zoom for Healthcare, or SimplePractice Telehealth. I do not build the video-visit infrastructure itself; that is a specialized vendor category where dedicated platforms already solve the problem well. Custom telehealth workflows — pre-visit AI triage, asynchronous messaging, patient matching — fall under Applications or AI Automation scope, not a marketing site project.