Investor-ready fintech marketing site with disclosures, funding proof, and a clean compliance footprint. Built by the engineer who shipped bolttech payment infrastructure and GigEasy's Barclays-backed MVP.
- Design
- Build
- Launch
fixed-price project
Who this is for
Fintech founder or marketing lead at a seed or Series A company, compliance-aware, fundraising or preparing to raise, with institutional buyers in the pipeline who will vet your site before any meeting.
The pain today
- Current site looks like a crypto meme and scares institutional investors
- Funding logos, disclosures, and jurisdiction statements are missing or buried
- Legal team cannot find what they need before a compliance review
- SOC 2 status and security posture are invisible on the marketing site
- Marketing and legal fight over content changes because everything requires a developer
The outcome you get
- Investor-ready fintech site shipped from $2,999 in three to four weeks
- Clean disclosure and jurisdiction footprint that passes legal review
- Funding logos, team bios, and compliance badges placed where buyers look first
- Content-edit audit trail through a CMS that logs every change with user and timestamp
- Cookie consent, privacy, and accessibility wired in from day one
Why fintechs lose deals on their website
Institutional buyers qualify fintechs in the first 30 seconds on your site. If the domain, the disclosures, or the team page look off, the meeting never happens. I have seen Series A rounds delayed because a legal team could not find a jurisdiction statement. I have also seen partnership deals stall because the product page did not name a single compliance framework.
The fix is not a redesign. It is discipline. Every trust signal in its place, every disclosure where legal expects it, every funding logo and customer name placed to reduce perceived risk. Fintech marketing sites that treat compliance as a design feature, not a legal burden, convert at a measurably higher rate than those that bury it in a footer.
Investor-ready fintech site shipped from $2,999 in three to four weeks
What institutional buyers actually look for
Enterprise buyers and VCs evaluate two things before they reply to your calendar invite: founding team credentials and evidence that your compliance posture is real.
On the credentials side: named founders with verifiable LinkedIn profiles, not generic team photos. Investor names (Barclays, Bain Capital, Tokio Marine-tier brands) displayed with the same visual weight as customer logos. A short but specific product description that shows you understand the regulated space you are operating in.
On the compliance side: SOC 2 badge or an honest 'in progress' note placed near your primary CTA, not buried in the footer. A jurisdiction and entity statement in the legal footer. A security page in plain language. Testimonials with a real role and full company name. These are not nice-to-haves. For regulated buyers they are the gate between a meeting and a pass.
40+: Payment providers integrated.
My fintech site trust checklist
Accessibility: WCAG 2.1 AA, keyboard-navigable, screen-reader tested. This is both a legal baseline and a signal to enterprise buyers that you take quality seriously.
Privacy: GDPR and CCPA cookie consent, a data processor list, and GTM scoped so marketing tags do not touch protected pages.
A trust center that aggregates security posture, compliance certifications, and data residency in one place. When a procurement team asks where your data lives, you send them one URL.
CMS with an edit audit trail. Every content change logged with user and timestamp. Required for FINRA-adjacent content reviews and useful for your own legal team when copy needs sign-off.
Hosting on a reputable provider with a plain-language answer to 'where does data live.' Default is Vercel (US regions). AWS or a specific region is a two-hour change if your enterprise buyers require it.
Every one of those items is a setup task measured in hours, not weeks. Each one saves time in your next compliance or investor due-diligence review.
Pricing and timeline
Starter fintech site from $2,999: up to eight pages, your copy, my layout, CMS-ready. Business tier from $7,999: custom copy, a full trust center, disclosure pages, legal review support, and integrations. Corporate tier from $11,999: multi-jurisdiction, regional content, custom integrations, and an investor microsite.
Timeline is three to four weeks start to launch. Every project comes with a 14-day money-back guarantee and a 1-year bug warranty. You own 100 percent of code, design, and content under Work Made for Hire. NDA is standard and signed before I see any sensitive material. IRS and IR35-safe B2B invoicing for cross-border customers.
What I shipped at bolttech and GigEasy
At bolttech, the $1B+ unicorn backed by Tokio Marine and MetLife, I led the Payment Service that integrated 40+ payment providers across Asia and Europe. The platform ran at 99.9 percent uptime with zero post-launch critical bugs. That kind of production work requires an obsessive preparation phase: clear scope, a stack simple enough to audit, and a hard line between what the marketing site touches and what the payment rails touch.
At GigEasy I shipped a Barclays and Bain Capital-backed MVP from scratch in 3 weeks, against a typical ten-week development cycle. Investor demo on schedule, zero post-launch fires. The same rigor applies to a fintech marketing site. The site is not the product, but it is the first thing every investor and enterprise buyer sees. It has to hold up.
When a specialist fintech brand agency is the right call
If you are a $50M+ ARR fintech running a full rebrand with custom photography, motion graphics, and a multi-agency campaign, you likely need a specialist brand shop with in-house production and art direction. I am not that.
I am the senior engineer you hire when the site needs to ship fast, clear investor scrutiny, and run without maintenance overhead forever. Most fintechs under Series B land in that category. If you are bigger and need a full brand campaign alongside the site build, the creative direction should come from a shop that lives in brand strategy. I can still build the technical side and integrate whatever assets they produce.
Recent proof
A comparable engagement, delivered and documented.
Unified payment orchestration across Asia and Europe
Delivered the payment orchestration platform at bolttech, a $1B+ unicorn, with 40+ integrations across multiple regions.
Read the case studyFrequently asked questions
The questions prospects ask before they book.
My fintech site tiers start at $2,999 for a Starter (up to eight pages, CMS-ready), $7,999 for Business (custom copy, trust center, disclosure pages), and $11,999 for Corporate (multi-jurisdiction, investor microsite). Those are fixed prices, not estimates. The final cost depends on how many compliance pages, languages, and integrations you need. Most seed-stage fintechs land in the Starter or Business tier.
Three to four weeks from kickoff to launch for a Starter or Business tier. The Corporate tier with multi-jurisdiction content adds one to two weeks. I have shipped an investor-ready fintech MVP in 3 weeks at GigEasy, so the timeline is real, not aspirational. The main variable is how fast your legal team can review and approve copy. Budget an extra week if compliance sign-off is part of the process.
Named founders with real LinkedIn links, investor logos placed with the same visual weight as customer logos, a short product description that proves you understand the regulatory space, and SOC 2 status visible near the primary CTA rather than buried in a footer. On the legal side: jurisdiction statement, entity name, and a security page in plain language. These are the signals institutional buyers use to decide whether a meeting is worth their time.
Yes, that is part of the process. Every disclosure, jurisdiction statement, and regulated claim lives in a versioned CMS with an edit audit trail. Your legal team can review copy in staging before anything goes live. I am an engineer, not a lawyer, so I do not replace legal counsel. But I have shipped for GigEasy (Barclays and Bain-backed) and bolttech (a $1B+ unicorn), and I know what a clean review looks like. Budget one to two extra weeks if your legal team needs to sign off on copy.
Marketing sites should not touch cardholder data directly. If you need payment forms, I wire them through a PCI-compliant provider using embedded elements so card data never hits your server, keeping you out of scope. At bolttech I integrated 40+ payment providers in production, so I know the tradeoffs. If your setup requires in-scope handling for a specific product reason, that is usually an Applications engagement rather than a marketing site build.
Yes. The Corporate tier at $11,999 covers multi-language and multi-jurisdiction content. Cookie consent defaults to the strictest market you operate in. GDPR and CCPA ready. If you are registered in specific states or countries, disclosure pages get templated and placed where your legal team needs them. I have shipped multi-jurisdiction fintech work including bolttech, which operates across Asia and Europe.
Completely. Every project is Work Made for Hire. Once you pay, 100 percent of code, design assets, and content is yours with no ongoing license fees. You get the Git repository, the Figma files, and full CMS admin access. If you want to move the project to another developer in year two, everything is set up for a clean handoff. NDAs are standard and signed before I see any sensitive material.