Node.js advisory engagement

Node.js consultant for backends that are slow, leaky, or unclear

Written audit covering event loop, queries, queues, memory. Delivered by someone who ran Node at $1B+ unicorn scale.

Available for new projects
See Fractional CTO

Starting at $4,500/mo · monthly retainer

Who this is for

Engineering manager whose Node.js backend is slow, leaking memory, or hitting scale limits.

The pain today

  • The team is guessing at performance with no profiling baseline.
  • Memory usage climbs until the process restarts.
  • Slow endpoints have never been measured — only complained about.
  • Leadership wants to know if this scales or if it needs a rewrite.

The outcome you get

  • A written Node.js audit covering event loop, queries, queues, memory.
  • A prioritized fix list with hours per item.
  • A clear scale-vs-rewrite recommendation.
  • Optional implementation follow-up.

What the Node.js audit covers

The Node.js audit profiles the running system: event-loop lag under load (clinic.js doctor, 0x), query performance (slow-query log, Prisma metrics, database EXPLAIN plans for the top 20 queries), queue health (BullMQ dashboard, retry rates, dead-letter depth), memory profile (heapdump analysis, leak detection on representative traffic), response-time distribution (p50, p95, p99), and deploy topology (node instances, autoscaling, health-check discipline). Each finding lands with severity, business-cost framing (dollars per month on cloud, engineer hours, uptime risk), and hours to fix.

bolttech as the scale reference

bolttech Payment Service ran NestJS plus Node.js across 40+ payment provider integrations with 99.9% uptime on payment traffic. Scale decisions there — how to split workers from API processes, when to introduce a queue, how to handle provider retries without overwhelming downstream systems — are the reference I bring to audits. If your Node.js backend is trying to decide 'do I scale or do I rewrite', that production reference is where the recommendation grounds.

Three fixes that show up in almost every Node audit

Fix one: move synchronous work out of the request handler. Crypto, large JSON parse, file I/O belong on workers or worker_threads. Fix two: add a queue for anything slower than 200ms that does not need to return inline — email, webhooks, indexing, report generation. BullMQ on Redis is the default. Fix three: add structured logging plus a Sentry-grade error tracker plus basic Prometheus metrics. You cannot fix what you cannot see. These three together usually clear 60 to 80% of reported performance problems before any algorithmic change.

Pricing and deliverable

Advisory engagement at $4,500 per month (pro-rated for 1 to 4 week scope). Deliverables: written audit report, prioritized fix list with hours, one 60-minute debrief call with leadership, 2-week follow-up. If implementation is needed the Applications subscription at $3,499 per month covers it. Many teams do the audit first and hand the fix list to an in-house engineer.

Recent proof

A comparable engagement, delivered and documented.

Payment Integration Platform

Unified payment orchestration across Asia and Europe

Delivered the payment orchestration platform at bolttech, a $1B+ unicorn, with 40+ integrations across multiple regions.

Fintech$1B+ unicorn40+ payment providers15 new markets
Read the case study

Frequently asked questions

The questions prospects ask before they book.

How long does the audit take?
1 to 4 weeks. A mid-size Node.js backend with tests takes 2 weeks. A larger or untested codebase takes 4.
Do you need production access?
Read-only monitoring plus a week of logs plus one or two days of p95 traffic samples is enough. I do not need write access to production databases.
Can you benchmark against a competitor?
Yes. k6 or Artillery load tests against both your service and a comparable competitor endpoint, with a written comparison.
Will the audit recommend a rewrite?
Rarely. Most Node.js audits I run recommend a targeted refactor plus an observability baseline, not a rewrite. Rewrites are reserved for pre-TypeScript codebases older than 6 years or frameworks long out of support.
What about Deno or Bun?
I have tested both and have opinions, but I do not recommend migrating a production Node.js service to Deno or Bun in 2026 unless the team has a specific reason. Node 20 plus TypeScript is still the pragmatic default.
Get started in 60 seconds

Ready to start?

Tell me what you need in 60 seconds. Tailored proposal in your inbox within 6 hours.

Available for new projects